ABOUT CONTEMPORARY CHINA

Mao, wake up!

Mao Zedong, the leader of the Chinese people, is popular today - souvenirs with the Great Pilot are sold in different parts of the Middle Kingdom, his portrait hangs in the main square of Beijing - Tiananmen. Modern Chinese authorities do not particularly encourage discussion of Mao's activities, preferring to follow the traditional formula for assessing the results of his reign: 70 percent of merit, 30 percent of errors. Meanwhile, there are people in the country who enthusiastically recall Mao and his times- the times of the class struggle.

"The old son of a bitch Mao forced us to suffer," - pronouncing these words at a well-covered table, the popular TV presenter Bee Fujian did not suspect that Mao might cause him to suffer even after death. In social networks and the newspaper Global Times there was a noise, which led to the removal of this presenter from the air. A year and a half later, under the criticism of the Maoists, 62-year-old professor of Shandong University of Construction, Deng Xiangchao, was wounded. On January 4, 2017, more than a hundred people came out with a protest to the university building, demanding to punish Dan for insulting the great leader. Protesters loudly shouted "traitor", raised the posters "Who is against Mao – is an enemy of the people" and fought with the defenders of the professor. The matter ended with the fact that the next day the party committee demanded that Deng Xiangchao resign from the post of deputy head of the art school of the university.

In the twentieth century, in China and Russia, there have been major transformations associated with the revolutionary restructuring of society, transformations that are often very painful for those who are among the "enemies of the people." Every Revolution is a hard struggle of someone against someone and sacrifices are inevitable here. For example, the future leader Deng Xiaoping and his family, who were at the beginning of the Cultural Revolution in disgrace, were the goal of the Red Guards, the revolutionary fighters. The most severely affected son was Dan Pufang, whom the "red guards" threw from the third floor, making him wheelchair bound.

Although there is no special romanticization of the era of the Cultural Revolution in the PRC, among economists and historians, a revision of that time has already occurred. They proved that from the beginning of the 1970s the Chinese economy grew at a high pace, at the same time the foundation for subsequent reforms was laid, many railways, highways and dams were built. According to reports of the beginning of 2010, in the village of Nanjie in the north of China, the past has been preserved. People literally stayed in Maoist China, despite the reforms of the 80s carried out in the country. The commune with the old economic order - an equal distribution of things and products, the absence of rich people, daily listening to revolutionary songs. True, the true purpose of preserving such a village may not be so beautiful – as there is tourist stream from all over the country has been drawn to it.

If you sit in a taxi in a Chinese city and do not know the language, you risk not only to go for a long ride coasting you a lot of money and not to where you expect, but also to be left without pleasure listening to the opinions of drivers about tough guy Putin and your salary. Less often, but still there is also a chance to hear exclamations about the current and not the most equitable structure of society and impersonal politicians of our time. In contrast to the social problems of today's day (including the catastrophic gap between rich and poor and the number of billionaires in a formally socialist state), the Mao era for many people is an era of social justice and order.

In modern China, Mao Zedong is seen as a great leader, whose unquestionable merit is the creation of the People's Republic of China. "Revolutionary leaders are not gods, they are people. And we can not worship them as gods, or deny people the right to point out mistakes and correct them only because they are big, just as we can not completely reject them and cross out their historical exploits just because they made mistakes. We can not judge our predecessors on the basis of current conditions of the level of development, "- perhaps, this is the most characteristic quote of the current chairman of 2013.

The father of the current head of China, Xi Jinping, Xi Zhongxun was a member of the first generation of leaders of the PRC, at one time he held the post of deputy chairman of the State Council. In his speeches, he stressed how much he is grateful to Mao, and that one can only win by following the path chosen in the revolution. However, in 1962, Si fell into disgrace, was imprisoned. This, in turn, was reflected in the fate of his son - the persecution and life in the village - through all this had to pass the current leader of China. After the end of the Cultural Revolution, the family was rehabilitated. Xi Jinping himself from the moment he became chairman, resorted to quoting Mao, visits the mausoleum and appeals to the party with the call "to raise the banners of the teachings of Mao Zedong."

However, he uses this rhetoric for a reason: he needs to discipline and deploy a large-scale anti-corruption campaign in the party ranks. If Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin did not overextend the population with the theme of building communism, then Si constantly reminds that one who does not believe in communism can not be a good member of the party. It will be built, albeit in the distant future.

However, Xi Jinping and Mao Zedong share not only slogans about building communism, but also efforts to combat corruption. Si intercepted the old slogans of the left - the struggle to exclude from the ranks of the party people who derive personal benefits. Si is like saying: the party is true to the spirit with which it was created in 1921. Since 2013, law enforcement agencies and the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, according to official data, have punished more than 1.3 million officials. Interestingly, the first major target of this struggle was the head of the Chongqing regional committee and member of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee, Bo Xilai. In 2014, for the first time in 40 years, a member of the Standing Committee of the CPC Central Committee, Bo Xilai Zhou Yongkang, an associate member, was also brought to trial. Recognizing the blame for bribery, he went to jail for the rest of his life. Xi Jinping states that it is impossible to erase the first 30 years from the history of the PRC, honoring only the second 30 years, exactly the same as vice versa.

If even over the past decade, Mao's supporters sought to create more traditional political groups (for example, the Maoist Communist Party), today the development of Maoism goes online. To estimate the exact number of Mao adherents in modern China is not possible, but the indirect facts speak for themselves.

The same opinion is held, for example, by one of the leaders of the moderately left Zhang Hongliang: "The authorities really stopped pressuring the left. But this does not mean supporting their ideas in everything. " Such a maneuver is not new, but it is necessary today for Xi Jinping for successful long-term rule, consolidation of society, while maintaining positions in the economy. The National People's Congress (NPC) approved the most important amendments to the country's constitution: now the PRC president is not obliged to limit himself to two terms of succession. Everything goes to the fact that Xi Jinping will stay in high places for at least a third term - which means that new rules of the game are expected for social groups, political informals and intellectuals of different ideological trends. The future of the PRC in many ways is not clear.
Revolutionary history of the Soviet Union and the Chinese People's Republic. How much in them and similar and fundamentally different features! In China, "took place" and his "collective" Beria - the "gang of four" and his analogue of 1937 - 1937 - the Great Cultural Revolution, with the deaths of the first great leaders - Stalin (1956) and Mao Zedong (1976) began a gradual ( in the USSR) and a sharp (in the PRC) departure from the construction of communism. But, economic results are fundamentally different. Here is the transformation of the USSR into an economically "bored" secondary power and a powerful economic growth of the PRC. Perhaps the fact is that the new economic elites in these two countries had fundamentally different development goals? We, the modern Bolsheviks, should carefully and objectively study the history of our countries, compare, draw conclusions and, of course, fight pro-American (in fact) forces that are trying to drive a wedge between our two nuclear powers in their natural consolidation in confronting American imperialism.
The material was prepared by SV Khristenko using separate fragments published in https://lenta.ru/articles/2018/04/02/chinese_radicals/

The Cold War never ended

Interview with the expert of the Moscow Economic Forum Srdjom Trifkovic, editor of the foreign policy department of the magazine Chronicles (USA). The 6th IEF was held on April 3-4, 2018 in the Russian Academy of Sciences.

It looks like we are already at the start of a new cold war. What does it have in common with the Cold War of the 20th century, and what are the differences?

The very formulation of the question is wrong - the Cold War never ended. This was reflected in the expansion of NATO to the east for 15 years after the collapse of the USSR and the development of the crisis in Ukraine in 2004 -2014. The challenges that Russia faces are not connected with its current policy today. They are a reflection of the deep hatred that Western political and media elites have against Russia as such. This hostility exists, and expresses itself clearly since the Crimean War.

What new world order can appear as a result of the current confrontation?

There are three scenarios. The first that President Trump can defeat the "deep state" in the US, will fulfill his election promises, including that he will discharge his relations with Russia. But this is very optimistic and unlikely. The second scenario - the US continues foolhardy confrontation, with unintended consequences, escalation and a tragic military outcome. This is more likely than the first option, but so far this scenario has not yet been implemented. And the third, the most probable. Long-term unstable balance with tendencies towards multipolarity, which will be resisted by the weakening unipolar hegemonism. This scenario requires Russia to adhere relentlessly and resolutely to the preemptive challenges of the West. The Russian leadership must understand that those whom they call "Western partners", seriously want to destroy Russia. And Russia must with its firmness force them to recognize their equal status as a great power, with legitimate security interests and regional interests. But such recognition will never be obtained through concessions, expressions of goodwill and call to reason.

How do you see the alignment of forces in the world between the US, China, Europe and Russia?

"Europe" is no longer an autonomous independent player. The countries of continental Europe follow the Anglo-American leadership in Russophobic hysteria. And this represents a further triumph of Atlantic domination in Europe. It should be especially noted that both Germany and France, the alleged leaders of an independent European foreign policy, are now reduced in their status to automatic followers of the "Anglo-sphere". We simultaneously observe in the West a hysterical phase of the discourse of Russophobia, which defies any rational arguments; and also we saw the successful degradation of European diplomacy to the status of obliging satellites.

Is the demonization of Russia and Russophobia only an instrument of geopolitical play in the West, or are these inalienable essential characteristics of Russia's perception?

The two pillars on which the West stands, and primarily Anglo-American Russophobia, are mutually complementary. First, in geopolitical terms, we observe the usual aspiration of maritime empires (Britain before World War I, the USA after World War II) to "contain", encircle, and if possible, squeeze out the Eurasian Heartland, whose heart is of course Russia. And secondly, we also have an instinctive, deep cultural antipathy: the perception of Russia as the eternal "other" by Western elites, and the consequence is the desire not only to influence Russian politics and behavior, but to make an irreversible change of regime in Moscow - and fundamentally transform Russian identity into Western postmodernism. And let me add that some of the worst, most insanely hateful anti-Russian stereotypes come from Russia itself, from those representatives of the liberal "intelligentsia" and emigrants who passionately hate the country where they were born and the people of Russia.

On April 15, DAY OF THE SUN is celebrated in the DPRK

On April 15, 1912 in the suburbs of Pyongyang in a poor peasant working family - the family of revolutionaries, was born Kim Il Sung. A man was born whose activity changed not only the life of the Koreans, but also the destiny of the Korean nation and determined the future development of the national liberation movement in Asia after the end of World War II. In his youth, having created the Down with Imperialism Union from his peers, Kim Il Sung later became the leader of the revolutionary struggle of the Koreans against Japanese enslavement for the liberation of the nation from foreign oppression, for the establishment of a socialist system in Korea on the example of the USSR.

The intense revolutionary struggle ain the creation of the Korean People's Revolutionary Army by uniting the scattered revolutionary guerrilla units laid the foundation for the liberation of the Motherland from the Japanese yoke in August 1945. The creation of the Communist Party of North Korea by Kim Il Sung in 1945, with its transformation into the Workers’ Party of Korea, became the ideological foundation for the construction and development of the DPRK's socialist state, the core of its monolithic unity, independence, strength and invincibility.

The merits of the Great Leader of Comrade Kim Il Sung to the Korean nation are enormous: the creator of the WPK, the KPA, the DPRK, the Eternal President ... The Juche idea, proposed by him, being embodied in the ideological treatise by the continuer of his work, the Great Kim Jong Il, became the state ideology of the country, the ideological basis for building and development of the socialist Korean state. Under Kim Il Sung, North Korea was recognized throughout the world, although, until 1945, hardly anyone knew about the existence of Korea at all. Under Kim Il Sung, diplomatic relations between the DPRK and most countries of the world were established.

Particular attention was drawn to the DPRK people of those countries that took the path of national liberation struggle during the collapse of the world colonial system after the end of World War II. The DPRK nder Kim Il Sung almost from scratch rose as an economically developed country. Before the establishment of the DPRK in Korea, as a colony of Japan, there were only 12 people with higher education, the bulk of the population was illiterate. In a socialist country, every fourth Korean got a higher education. The powerful scale of the development of the economy, the mining industry, the power industry through the construction of power stations in small and medium-sized rivers, the reconstruction of land and the selection of new varieties of agricultural plants for food production contributed to a sharp increase in yields, in particular rice - the main agricultural crop in the DPRK. Huge housing construction with the provision of free housing to the state, free 12-year secondary education and free-of-charge stay in children's day care centers and gardens, provision of scholarships and free meals to all students during training in educational institutions, extensive development of physical culture and sports, science and of an original culture and much, much more characterizes the DPRK as a country in which at the centre is Man, her people. The founder of socialist Korea put forward a slogan for all party and economic workers - "To worship the people like the sky." This slogan was carried out under Kim Il Sung and is now being implemented in practice.

The DPRK, as mentioned above, has become a very attractive country for developing countries of the world. Constant links with most of them, holding different kinds of symposiums, meetings, international conferences are a common occurrence for the DPRK.

Always in the DPRK, great attention is paid to solving the issue of the reunification of the Korean nation, Korean families, separated by the Americans after the end of World War II because of the occupation of South Korea and the US refusal to withdraw its troops from the territory of the Korean peninsula. Instead of withdrawing its troops, the US expanded the creation of new military bases in South Korea - military bases in the US equipped with the latest generation of weapons.

Under Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il, several meetings of members of the Korean families divided by the war were organized. Several Declarations on improving relations between the DPRK and the Republic of Korea were adopted. But because of the constant resistance to the unification of Korea from the US, this issue remains unresolved to this day. We welcome the fact that, without US intervention at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, the DPRK and the Republic of Korea athletes acted as a united team under the flag of a unified (in the future) state of the Korean peninsula.

The successors of the Great Leader, Comrade Kim Il Sung, the Great Kim Jong Il and the Supreme Leader, Comrade Kim Jong-un, continued the policy of Comrade Kim Il Sung in all aspects of the state's activities, both in the matter of its defense against armed attack by the United States, and in improving the people's livelihood , the development of science, technology, the economy as a whole.

Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-un continued to improve the Korean Armed Forces by equipping them with nuclear weapons developed by the DPRK and the means of delivering them (under Kim Jong-un) to the United States in the event of an armed attack on the DPRK by the United States, blackmailing the DPRK by inflicting a preventive nuclear strike on Socialist Korea. But no matter how the American hawks tried to frighten the freedom-loving Korean people under Kim Jong-Un, by organizing monstrous military maneuvers near the borders of the DPRK, monstrous in scale and nuclear equipment of the military means used to destroy everything and everyone, but, as they say, the train has already left. And apart from furious anger at the fact that the DPRK has been out of reach for the United States and insults the leader of the DPRK, America can do nothing more than to intensify economic sanctions against the DPRK, which completely block the country's foreign economic ties. Still, all attempts by the US to slander the DPRK with the use of its vassals in the world to pressure the DPRK and force it to renounce the possession of nuclear weapons remain in vain. At the same time, the DPRK officially declares to the whole world that its nuclear weapons will not be used as a means of attacking anyone in the world, but only for retaliation against the aggressor, which may suddenly encroach on the independence of the DPRK. We, the AUCPB, fully support the policy of the DPRK in the matter of its possession of nuclear weapons and its use in the case only as a retaliatory strike against the aggressor.

The US is doing it all. The United States is trying to kill this freedom-loving people by tightening economic sanctions against the DPRK. The United States does not understand the policy of the socialist state and its people, which has achieved its independence by years of armed brutal struggle against Japanese colonial slavery. The US does not understand the persistence, heroism and self-sacrifice of the Koreans in the Fatherland War of Liberation 1950-1953, when the US imperialist hegemony for the first time in its history ended the war not by victory, but by signing an armistice with the DPRK. This fact is how America's warriors, who fought then with the DPRK, continue to experience the disgrace of America.

The unyielding tough stance of the Supreme Leader of the DPRK Comrade Kim Jong-Un has had its own effect. President of the United States Donald Trump has recently begun to sometimes pronounce words about the possibility of holding talks with the Supreme Leader of the DPRK, Comrade Kim Jong-Un. We, the Bolsheviks, welcome the opportunity, glittering on the horizon, to solve the "Korean question" by peaceful means.

On the occasion of the 106th anniversary of the birth of Comrade Kim Il Sung, we, the Bolsheviks, congratulate the Supreme Leader of the DPRK, Comrade Kim Jong-Un, and in his person the heroic Korean people on this landmark date and wish the beautiful country and people of the DPRK further success in building a powerful socialist state , the state of freedom and equality of all citizens, the aspirations of the country to the prosperous prosperous socialist state ruled by the freedom-loving people - the citizens of the DPRK.

Central Committee of the AUCPB

ANOTHER LONDON FARCE

I watch TV, I work on the Internet, I read newspapers - everywhere a "terrible and even more terrible" incident with Sergey Skripal and his daughter - Julia. Nearly poisoned to death by Russian "offenders". A whole month they scrambled out of the consequences of a terrible chemical attack, came to their senses. But there are still more victims - this is the home cat of Nich Van Drake and the guinea pigs who lived at his house. The cat was put to sleep, then all the animals were cremated. Why the mystery of the investigation. Relatives of the Skripals are not allowed to enter Great Britain. I think - so as not to interfere with the proper conduct of the investigation. And the more I delve into the work of the Skripals, the more I begin to understand - after all, something like that happened once before somewhere. And, suddenly, like a shroud fell from my eyes, - but this is an analogue of the case of "Zinoviev's letter". The analogue, of course, is incomplete, but all events as in 1924 are developing in the UK.

Let's remember what happened then. September 15, 1924, the British Foreign Ministry received from MI5 (British counterintelligence) a copy of a secret letter allegedly written by Zinoviev, chairman of the executive committee of the Comintern. On October 25, 1924, 4 days before the parliamentary elections in Britain, in the newspaper Daily Mail was published this "Letter by Zinoviev, addressed to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Great Britain. The letter, dated September 15, 1924, called for the strengthening of relations with the Bolshevik government and intensified subversive work in the army and navy, preparing its own cadres for the coming civil war, and proclaiming a course toward an armed struggle against the bourgeoisie. In the letter it was proposed to create cells "in all military units, as well as in factories manufacturing weapons."

The "letter" caused a noisy scandal. It was then about granting Russia a large loan. On the same day as the letter appeared in the media, the British Foreign Ministry sent a special note to the plenipotentiary representative of the USSR in the United Kingdom, Rakovsky, in which the "Zinoviev letter" was interpreted as "instructions for British subjects to forcibly overthrow the existing system in that country and disintegrate the armed forces of His Majesty". In Rakovsky's reply to the note, which followed the very next day, the authenticity of the "Zinoviev's letter" was denied and a number of serious proofs were given that the content of the document consists of a series of absurdities aimed at restoring British public opinion against the USSR.

Ostensibly the "signatories" of the letter - and Grigory Zinoviev himself, and the representative of the British Communists Arthur McManus, and one of the leaders of the Comintern Otto Kuusinen, categorically rejected their involvement in the publication. In the USSR, the search for the author of the letter began. At a meeting of the Politburo on December 18, they suggested that the person who had obtained the "Zinoviev letter" should declare himself, and "he is guaranteed security and impunity". Alas, no one responded!

As a result of the publication of this letter, the Labour Party lost the elections, and the first in British history, the Labour government of Ramsey MacDonald was forced to resign. Anglo-Soviet relations were for many years spoiled. The Anglo-Soviet trade agreement was not ratified, Soviet Russia failed to obtain loans for the economic recovery. Agree - the political outcome of the appearance of "Zinoviev's letter" was very significant.

The history of the letter developed for a long time. Thus, on March 19, 1928, the Conservative Baldwin delivered a speech in Parliament and brought some newly discovered "mystical circumstances" about the "Soviet" origin of the letter, which were immediately refuted by the USSR People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs Chicherin. The origin of the fake was eventually established. As they say: "no matter how tangled the rope is, the ends are in there somewhere." It turned out that the organizer of the scandalous provocation in agreement with his leadership was the British intelligence officer Major Desmond Morton. The original letter was discovered in 1965, resulting in a book-investigation "Zinoviev's Letter" written by three journalists of the British newspaper The Sunday Times.

In February 1968, the same newspaper published publications related to the discovery in the archives of Harvard University of photocopies of the manuscript "Zinovieva-va." The graphical analysis done by the expert John Conway showed the belonging of the "letter" to the intelligence officer Sidney Reilly (he is known to us in Soviet history), who was also involved in the fabrication of the fake. After studying the declassified archives of the United Kingdom's special services, as well as archives in Moscow, the leading historian of the British Foreign Ministry, Jill Bennett, concluded that the letter that caused the Labour government of MacDonald to collapse in 1924 and the relations between Britain and Russia deteriorated was a fake.

What was the purpose of the fake with Zinoviev's letter? Yes, the obvious. Pour mountains of dirt on the Soviet country, cause hatred and disgust for these "bloody" Bolsheviks, undermine the confidence of the masses in the British Labour Party. In this respect, the story with Skrypal pursues exactly the same goals, although the world has changed so much in a hundred years. Why is it that Skripal is a traitor, released by the Russian government as a result of an exchange of spies? I think he turned out to be a successful character for another anti-Russian farce, as, they say, before this character, poisoned with radioactive polonium. Radioactive polonium was necessary here to the organizers of the fake, for intimidating the public (after all, the radioactive polonium!) - what, after all, are these terrible Russians!

How, in fact, was the case of the Skripals? I think it's much easier to find here than in the history of 1924. Subjects do something - here they are! Significant moment - the earliest messages on the Internet clearly called the cause of poisoning - fentanyl - a powerful narcotic analgesic. Both the father and daughter take a prohibitively large dose of the drug (death in such cases is a common occurrence). Feeling that they are ill, they rush for help "to people", crouching and never getting off of the bench in the park. Discovering the injured, a woman told reporters that "the couple were sitting on the bench as if in a "frozen state", "the hands of Skrypal were raised upwards with the palms, as if he was stretching. The eyes stared at the house in front of him. He was conscious, but as if paralyzed, a little swinging back and forth.” Mobile phones for both of them were turned off! It is interesting that an ambulance doctor who helped the Skripals on the spot did not suffer at all. Most likely, they did not "inject" the drug, but "sniffed" it, making their hands "dirty". The consequences of this for the future are clear. It is clear as to why the stubborn refusal to allow even relatives to communicate with the victims, and the destruction of the cat and guinea pigs simply because they turned out to be "redundant" in the official version of events.

How the British authorities are now to act , when from the case of the Skripals in all directions stick out absurdities? Only one way - to remove the Skripals – "Skripal did his job ...". Plans are already seriously being discussed to transfer them to the United States or somewhere too far away, changing their appearance and issuing new documents, and all material evidence on the case - the house of Skripal, a bench where they were found and so on - to put to the fire.

As Hegel said well: "History repeats itself twice: the first time in the form of tragedy, the second in the form of a farce." This phrase is often mistakenly attributed to K. Marx. Its real author is the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), as K. Marx himself points out in his work "The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte."

S.V. Khristenko

Statement of the Central Committee of the AUCPB on the aggression of the United States, France and Britain against Syria

Having crudely violated the UN Charter and bypassing the UN Security Council, the United States, along with France and the United Kingdom, committed an act of aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic on Saturday, April 14, inflicting massive missile strikes on its territory.

The reason for the aggression was the incident on April 7 in the city of Duma, where allegedly Syrian armed forces were using chemical weapons. A rocket attack on Syria's military and civilian infrastructure was inflicted by ships in the Red and Mediterranean Seas, the Persian Gulf, and bombers.

Among the objects that were attacked - a research center in the Syrian capital, the headquarters of the Republican Guard, an air defense base, several military airports and army depots.

For two years, the Syrian army, with the support of the Russian Forces, defeated the most efficient grouping of I.S. in Syria, behind which stand are the imperialist United States, whose aim is to overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad in the Libyan scenario. Syria is an Arab state in the Middle East, it is engaged in a consistent struggle against imperialism and Zionism, takes a firm stand against interference in the affairs of the Arab states, which causes the frenzy of the imperialist United States.

The loss of US strategic positions in the Middle East is the real cause of the aggression.

"The attack was due to the awareness of the colonial Western powers supporting terrorism that they lost control ... The aggression occurred after the terrorists did not reach the goals of those countries that were involved in the war against Syria," said the president of the SAR Bashar Assad.

The attacks were made at a time when the inspectors of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were due in the very near future to go to the city of the Duma with the task of establishing the truth about the use of chemical weapons in Syria. According to the Syrian Foreign Ministry, the aggression of the United States, France and Britain on Syrian targets is aimed at disrupting the mission of the OPCW in verifying reports of allegedly committed chemical warfare in the city of the Duma.

Imperialism is the source of wars. The imperialist aggressors are fighting for sources of raw materials, spheres of capital application, for control over energy resources and strategic territories. "To eliminate the inevitability of wars, it is necessary to destroy imperialism" (J.V. Stalin).

The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks resolutely condemns the act of aggression by the United States, France and Great Britain against the independent Syrian Arab Republic.

We fully support the people of Syria in their struggle for their freedom and sovereignty.

Central Committee of the AUCPB

YEAR OF MAXIM GORKY

Recently, Russia solemnly celebrated the 75th anniversary of the Victory in the Battle of Stalingrad. The year of the anniversary of this victory is declared the year of Solzhenitsyn. In a country where the Great Victory is celebrated, there should be no honor to a person, to the one who spat on this victory without shame. But now in power is the oligarchy, for which there is nothing sacred, except for its own profits and power. Therefore, another important anniversary fell under an unofficial ban, was in the information blockade.

The year 2018 was to be the year of Maxim Gorky. The great writer was born 150 years ago, in 1868, on March 28, according to the new style calender. His books have now become less read in the school curriculum - he had to "move out the way" to allow Solzhenitsyn's propaganda and similar "fighters for freedom" to be shoved into children's brains. But we only know that history places everything in its place. It always happens, sooner or later. I will only recall why Maxim Gorky is worthy of the title of a great proletarian writer. Why it should be read.

Gorky wrote about the events that had engulfed his generation, and his contemporaries recognized him. He is one of the most significant and famous in the world of Russian writers and thinkers. Gorky was at the head of three major publishing houses and five times was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature. He founded a new style in art, socialist realism. He founded the Union of Writers of the USSR. Gorky was the Soviet writer most published in the USSR. And among all Russian writers Gorky is second only to L.N. Tolstoy and A.S. Pushkin.

Gorky wrote about us, who we are and what we can be. For example, in 1902 he wrote the play "The Lower Depths", in which he depicted the very bottom of society, the people of beggars, the homeless. In 1906 the novel "Mother" was published about people from the same lower classes who had already risen up to the revolutionary struggle. They rose in the name of their own dignity, in the name of life itself. They rose up because they were organized. And the last 10 years of his life Maxim Gorky devoted a novel-epic "The Life of Klim Samgin." Look at what he said about his plan:

"... that intelligentsia who lives abroad in emigration, slanders the Union of Soviets, organizes conspiracies and generally engages in baseness, this intelligentsia in the majority consists of the Samgins. They considered themselves to be a superclass group. This turned out to be wrong, because as soon as what happened happened, they immediately turned their backs on one class, their faces towards the other. What else to say? I wanted to depict in the person of Samgin such an intellectual of average value, who goes through a whole series of moods, looking for himself the most independent place in life, wherever it would be convenient and material and inward. "

Does not it make you think about today? Gorky needs to be re-read, I myself gave the floor to do it. There were already cases when fragments of his works helped to choose the right words, a key to man's aspirations, and these are just excerpts!

In 1937, the entire Soviet country solemnly remembered A.S. Pushkin, because then 100 years have passed from the day of his death. Then Pushkin's works acquired a second birth, and so far he is "our everything". We are sure that the works of Maxim Gorky will also revive in the minds of the people, and the flame, sparked by its spark, will still ignite. Remember the words from his story:

"And suddenly he tore open his chest between his hands and pulled his heart out of it and raised it high above his head. It burned as brightly as the sun, and brighter than the sun, and the whole forest fell silent, lit by this torch of great love for people ... "

We can be such torches as this heart. For this we need to gather people and implement our slogan - to work for the revolution. The word of Maxim Gorky in this is our assistant. Read the book – then pass it on!

Alexander Solzhenitsyn deserves only oblivion.

I. Kotran

IN MEMORY OF ALEXANDER VASILYEVICH PYLTSYNA

At the age of 95, on March 30, 2018, a hero of the Great Patriotic War died, a chevalier of 6 military orders, a legend of the penal battalion - Alexander Vasilievich Pyltsyn - a Soviet and Russian writer, the oldest author of the Russian People's Line, Major General of the Armed Forces of the USSR retired, full member of the Academy of Military History, laureate of the literary award . Marshal of the Soviet Union Govorov, a front-line soldier of the Great Patriotic War, a former company commander of the 8th officer's penal battalion, the author of several books dedicated to the penal battalion, Alexander Vasilievich Pyltsyn.

The Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks with great sadness expresses its deep condolences to the esteemed Antonina Vasilyevna and to all family members, relatives and friends, friends and comrades of the Deeply Respected Alexander Vasilyevich in connection with his death.

Alexander Vasilyevich was a fine man, a great patriot of his Socialist Fatherland, defended his homeland - the USSR on the front line, as an officer-commander of a company of an officer's penal battalion during the Great Patriotic War. For the faithful service to the Motherland. Pyltsyn was awarded many orders and medals.

After the war, he began his literary career, defending his homeland from the infamous writer-marak-traitors of the Motherland, who fled from the front line and hid from military operations in the camps for prisoners, buying their indulgence from the camp chiefs by informing on the prisoners.

It was in this way that A. Solzhenitsyn was the "hero" of a number of works by A.V. Pyltsyna, a slanderer and a thief, a scammer against his friends, who was raised on a pedastal up by liberals, now ruling the roost in Russia, to the rank of "honor and conscience of the Russian nation", expelled in February 1974 from the USSR and returned by Russian liberals to Russia in May 1994. Solzhenitsyn , scooped up the subjects of his anti-Soviet libels from the memories of the White Guards, embittered at Soviet power, stored in foreign libraries. And to this day, the liberal literary elite that prevails in Solzhenitsyn's insane, shameless lies and outright slander against our army, our people, our country, continues to inculcate in the minds and consciousness of student and student youth, deconstructing the youth, turning them into Ivan's relatives of those who do not remember, in Russophobe. Because the literary activity of A.V. Pyl'tsyn is so important and necessary for our people, especially the young. The mention of Solzhenitsyn in the obituary of A.V. Pyltsyn is important because on June 27, 2014 the "Presidential Decree No. 474" On the celebration of the 100th anniversary of the birth of A.I. Solzhenitsyn. " It says quite unambiguously about the "celebration" of this event, "given the great importance of A.I. Solzhenitsyn’s work for the national culture ... "The ruling elite and its liberal inspirers ignored M. Gorky, Sholokhov, Tvardovsky, Kataev and other heroes in 2018 - the great Russian Soviet writers.

In his literary works of military subjects, A.V. Pyltsyn defended the harsh truth of the Great Patriotic War from false inscriptions, thereby showing the truth of the fierce patriotic struggle of the heroic Soviet people against the fascist conquerors, the struggle "not for glory, but for life on earth." Books by А.V. Pyltsyn "Penalty kick", "Penalty in battle. From Stalingrad to Berlin "," Penalty. Atonement through Punishment "and others made a great contribution to the fair narrative of the exploits of the Soviet people and their Army in defeating fascism and liberating the peoples of Europe from German enslavement, and of individual nations from physical destruction.
The grateful memory of our friend, Alexander Vasilievich Pyltsyn will remain in our hearts and will be in our cause.

N.A. Andreeva
General Secretary of the AUCPB
Leningrad, 04/01/2018

AUCPB MAIN PAGE

Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the recognition of the authority of the Soviet of People's Commissars of the RSFSR in Pyatigorsk

The Bolsheviks of Pyatigorsk held a solemn meeting on March 25 near the monument of S.M. Kirov, dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the recognition of the power of the People's Commissars of the RSFSR in Pyatigorsk (1918), the 98th anniversary of the liberation of Pyatigorsk and Caucasian Mineral Waters from the White Guard troops of General Denikin (1920), and the 30th anniversary of the revival of Bolshevism 1988).

Relying on the Terek People's Council, the Bolsheviks of Pyatigorsk convened on March 17, 1918, the Second Congress of the Terek people. Sergei Mironovich Kirov delivered a report "On the Current Political Moment". The Congress adopted on March 17, 1918, a resolution recognizing the authority of the Soviet of People's Commissars of the RSFSR. The Terek region was declared an autonomous republic within the RSFSR.

In the square named after SM. Kirov were exhibited: the standard of the AUCPB, the flag of the AUCPB with the image of V.I. Lenin and J.V. Stalin, red flags with a sickle and a hammer, banners, and newspapers "Bolshevik Sickle and Hammer", "Revolution", were distributed including the book by N.A. Andreeva "The future is for socialism."

The meeting was opened by the playing of the Stalin anthem of the USSR. The meeting was addressed by the Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Comrade N.A. Degtyarenko, Secretary of the Mineralvodsky CC of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, Comrade V. Skvortsov. and other comrades.

Those present at the rally unanimously adopted the statement of the rally.

The foot of the monument to S.M. Kirov was blessed with flowers.

Long live the 100th anniversary of the recognition of the authority of the Soviet of People's Commissars of the RSFSR in the Terek Autonomous Republic!

Glory to the 30th anniversary of the revival of Bolshevism!

North-Caucasian Bureau of the Central Committee of the AUCPB.

 AUCPB main page